Trans awareness? Why thank you, Paul Dacre

Speaking, yesterday, to a journalist, who is likely to be writing up yet another “incisive” inquiry into trans issues at the weekend – for the Daily Mail, doncha know! – I was amused by one question, one angle he seemed determined to get back to.

Paraphrased – since he definitely didn’t put it this way – it seemed to boil down to: shit! Where are all these trannies coming from? Is it some sort of evil plot by political correct fascistas and money-grubbing clinicians to turn us all gender queer?

I hadn’t the heart to say.

Buddying up – how t’tranz is spread

For one reason, certainly, is a reason referenced by GIRES in one of their reports into the incidence of transsexuality in the UK. It’s the “buddy effect”: the fact that the more people that are comfortable coming out, living a trans life, talking about their experience, in any form, the more confidence it gave to others to do the same.

Like myself, for instance: growing up in a world in which trans was rarely anything other than Sunday tabloid freak show. Knowing something wasn’t right: not for a very long time being able to put a finger on it. What, I wonder, over and over, would have happened had I been born 30 years later? If I had been able to read regularly that there was this thing called gender dysphoria. That it affected loads of people. And it wasn’t either sexual perversion or the end of the world.

I digress. Back to the plot. Literally.

For deep in the soul of some of the mainstream editors beats a heart of purest paranoia. Timidity, too, if not outright cowardice.

Allow me to introduce to you the somewhat pathetic figure of Paul Dacre. So frightened of non-normative behaviour is he that he openly owned to the Leveson Inquiry that given the choice, he would always back a story that favoured “normal family life” over the alternatives.

So it is, with the recent spate of stories about gender transition becoming more deeply ingrained in the national psyche – and with individuals acknowledging gender difference earlier and earlier. Associated Newspapers Group, which includes not just the Mail but also brands such as the Metro and thisismoney, has regularly spun stories in ways that miss the point, fail to ask relevant questions, and generally do their utmost to stem this tide of filthy deviant values now sweeping the nation.

OK. We all knew that. We also know that there are occasions where, bowing to public pressure, these titles produce output that is fair, informed and sensitive (I know: I’m going to get flamed for that!).

Its the Sun – and Mail and Express – wot won it!

The point, though, the thing that has me ROFLing like mad, is that Dacre and his minions miss the point entirely.

Let’s go back a step. I think GIRES are right. The more a subject is publicized, written about, talked about, the more normal it becomes. The more likely it is that someone will go “that could be me” – and make that first important visit to their GP.

And who is pushing this information out in a seemingly never-ending gush nowadays. The Tavi? Charing Cross? Gender benders? New wave sexual theorists?

Er, no. Step forward the Mail, the Sun, the Metro, the Express – and a host of other small fry too. When the sexual history of this decade comes to be told, it seems not unlikely that historians will eventually come to recognize the signal part played by these titles in promoting trans awareness.

For which we have only the Mail to thank. Paul Dacre may not yet be spinning in his grave: his granddad surely is!

jane xx

Ooops: edited to note that apparently i have jumped the gun and Paul Dacre is yet plain, un-enobled Mr Dacre

8 Responses so far »

  1. 1

    Ignorance, either Unintentional, or as in a lot of cases completely Intentional, is the root of any Prejudice. Now I went to a place called College, as many Journalists and Editors must have done, and there I learned not so much What to research, as HOW to research and learn effectively. In light of this I must ask, have all these people somehow managed to Forget their educations? it must be either that or else they are so Self Centered that no one else’s opinion apart from their own counts in the little world they create in their minds, which would be sad. It’s diversity in ALL its forms that makes this world an interesting place to live for me, so these Prejudiced people must live very dull lives!. This is just my view and it will be interesting to see those of others here!

  2. 2

    Liz Church said,

    Lord Dacre of Slaphead

  3. 4

    Shirley Anne said,

    I was so annoyed at his ‘journalism’, using the term very lightly, after reading about it on Angelas blog, that I wrote to the Mail and told them so. Learning the trade isn’t the same as practicing it by all accounts. Well Paul Dacre thinks it is right to write opinionated articles rather than just the plain facts. No wonder I don’t buy newspapers!

    Shirley Anne x

  4. 5

    herr brockman said,

    It seems that in your efforts to enforce your particular brand of politcal correctness, you have succeeded in creating the much desired “status” of protected “other”.

    I always thought of you Brits as quite tolerant but it seems I have been sadly misled. To wit:

    http://themediablog.typepad.com/.a/6a011570c131b2970c016762dacedd970b-pi

    • 6

      janefae said,

      Not quite sure of the point you are making (are you disagreeing with the idea that some stuff should be subject to regulation – or what?).

      I aslo think it more helpful to the readerr in general if you link to the associated blog, as opposed to what you have linked to, which is just a pic, giving little background:

      http://themediablog.typepad.com/the-media-blog/2012/02/censorship-paddy-power-ryanair.html

      Lemme see. I share your concern at widespread censorship, espesh of humour. I also have some concern about violence against minorities and where humour crosses the ine into possibly provoking violence, i think the debate is more complex than the simple one about free speech.

      jane xx

  5. 8

    zoebrain said,

    Could be worse – and is for those of us who are Intersex.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2107085/Caroline-Kinsey-lived-man-41-years-parents-didnt-tell-shes-hermaphrodite.html

    “Caroline the human hermaphrodite tells her story for the first time”

    “Human Hermaphrodite”??

    I know it’s the Daily Mail, but this denigration would be unacceptable in 1912, let alone 2012.

    Thank God I live in Australia, and not in the journalistic cesspool that the UK has become. This isn’t the gutter-press any more, it’s the sewer press.

    We have enough problems with the medical issues without this.


Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: