News Feed: Home Office own goal on transphobic language

Yesterday’s broad welcome by the transgender community for a Home Office initiative on trans rights today lost a little of its sparkle, as activists noted that the language in which this initiative was announced was itself guilty of some of the bad practice believed to underpin transphobic prejudice.

Concerns were raised over a press release announcing the initiative, which described April Ashley as “the first Briton to undergo sex-change surgery”.

A media style guide published by the widely respected Trans Media Watch in March 2011 points out that terms such as “sex change” and “sex swap” are considered offensive to many in the trans community.

They add that terminology used in medicine and UK law includes “Sex reassignment surgery (SRS)” and “Gender reassignment surgery (GRS)”.

A spokesman for the Home Office was unrepentant. Describing the issue as “merely semantic”, he declined to comment further. Rather, he suggested, if the Press Office reacted to every individual criticism, nothing would ever get done.

Trans activist, Liz Church has written to the Home Office asking that this be amended.

A spokesperson for TMW said: “It is unfortunate that this very important initaitive has been clouded by a poor choice of words in some instances, but we still feel that there is positive intent behind it”.


This may all sound like nit-picking: dog in manger stuff, given that the Home Office initiative itself is very positive – and the trans community has nothing but respect for Equalities Minister, Lynne Featherstone.

But it isn’t. Central to the arguments advanced by TMW over the last few years has been the way in which the language used in the press and beyond contributes directly to transphobia: when the press use words like “tranny”, or “gender-bender” in respect of a trans person those then pop up in playground bullying.

That’s why they have been working with the Press Complaints COmmission and other media bodies on use of language: that is also why they are putting in a significant submission to the Leveson Inquiry into Press Standards.

Concerns over the term “sex change” are slightly more nuanced: speak with any trans man or woman and chances are that the majority will tell you that they are not channging anything: at least not anything to do with their gender. They always were the gender they identify as: and surgery is no more than aligning the external form to the inner reality.

In that sense, talking of “change” is profoundly unhelpful – and plays into the hands of those who aregue that “change” is not possible (for reasons of genetics or religion).

The press release is therefore unfortunate, and gives rise to two concerns – quite apart from the fact that it gives license to every other tabloid to use the phrase with impunity. First, it suggests a touch of laziness back at the Home Office: they are aware of TMW, and should be aware of the Media Guide, which has been distributed widely. That a press office should fail to take cognisance of such a document when writing up a release is not clever.

But there is also a degree of arrogance here. To amend the official release would take less than a minute’s work. But they won’t because this is mere “semantics”. In that refusal, they both miss the point and fall into the very same trap of ultra-defensiveness over the published word as the rest of the press.

Jane Fae

ETA: news is already coming in of major nationals such as the Telegraph and the Mail using the phrase “sex-change” as a direct result of the HO press release.

Note: The attention of news organisations wishing to make use of this content is drawn to the conditions of use. Failure to comply is likely to result in a large bill!


4 Responses so far »

  1. 1

    eclectic chicken said,

    I think you should complain about the fucker at the HO Jane… sorry… did I say ‘fucker’ I meant ‘individual concerned’…those darned semantics huh?

  2. 2

    Alex said,

    “speak with any trans man or woman and chances are that the majority will tell you that they are not channging anything: at least not anything to do with their gender.”

    Exactly. So why is the ‘condition’ referred to as gender dysphoria? Surely transexuals have never been dissatisfied with their gender because they’ve always known it, if only subconcsiously.

    Surely it should be sexual organ dysphoria? But what do I know, I’m only ambigenderous.

  3. 3

    kate said,

    The Home Office press release is also wrong: April Ashley was not the first British person to undergo SRS.

    Michael Dillon underwent f-m transition – including phalloplasty – in the 1940s and he did the intial surgery on Roberta Cowell before she had a vaginoplasty in 1951 in this country; nine years before April had hers in Casablanca.

    April’s real significance is, of course, for how the judgement in her divorce case in 1969/1970 made it impossible for anyone to change their birth certificate until the GRA.

    There are several stories online in The Telegraph, Indy etc which make the claim that April was the first – but she wasn’t.

  4. 4

    ‘and the trans community has nothing but respect for Equalities Minister, Lynne Featherstone’.

    Several issues with this statement. Lovely Lynne would be better served by the title inequalities minister as that’s what this creepy right winger is really about. “Lib Dem Equality Minister Lynne Featherstone opposes equality. She is vowing to retain the ban on heterosexual civil partnerships and on religious same-sex marriages by faith organisations that want to conduct them. This is in direct defiance of what her party members want: full equality. Read more here:
    Peter Tatchell Foundation

    There is no such thing as a TG community. It is purely an invention of a bunch of media wannabes and relies on a majority of TV’s who never leave their houses dressed as anything other than blokes.

    As anyone with one iota of common sense knows a liberal democrat is simple a tory quisling who will do anything to be in power no matter how despicable and underhanded. It would seem that the so called TG whatever’s are taken in by any rubbish churned out by these scumbags.

    I have not posted a comment here for a while and probably won’t be back in a hurry after I received the best bit of advice given to me since I started my transition from a person none of you will ever meet or hear from. She is someone I hold in the highest regard. ‘Don’t let them pin that T on you. Just get out there and be the woman that you are.’ This echoes the advice I will always give to anyone considering transition is ‘avoid anyone who uses, or subscribes to TG rubbish and steer well clear of the sleazy tranny scene.’

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: