Can you see the serious side?

Now. Stop me if you’ve heard this one. But, yesterday i was utterly offended by some truly awful jokes on TV.

We’re all targets now

Yep. They were taking the piss out of women. And black people. Dwarves. Lesbians. The disabled. Vegetarians. Ginger-haired types. Animal rights people. Conservatives. Socialists. Oh: and in between, there was an occasional joke thrown in about trannies.

Makes ya sick, eh?

Tactics, Tactics!

Or maybe it makes you think you need to think a bit more carefully about how we, as a community, respond to comedy. Because, as i have argued several times before, that is probably a much more complicated field of battle than news media – and if we are not careful, if we get it wrong, we could do ourselves far more damage.

Why? Well, perish the thought, but comedians are mostly individuals working in a vacuum: and while complaints to a commissioning body can have an effect, chances are that such an approach will be less effective overall than similar tactics in respect of news channels. Less centralisation. Less regulation. And probably ten times less respect for authority.

Now, before anyone gets a flea in their bonnet about me “defending” comedy: i am not. That’s another argument entirely. This, as a lot of my input to debate, is about tactics and asking the question as to whether what we do is effective – or runs the risk of backlash.

I don’t think that with general media work. I do with comedy.

Why? First off, all groups have a brand image. Brand may be untrue: unfair; but i promise you, it exists. Part of that brand may be seen in the widely shared of clichés that enable comedians to build jokes for public consumption: another part (the meta-brand) is below the surface…the things we tend to believe rather less overtly about a group, possibly are not even aware we believe about them.

An example of the first is the mainstay of tranny humour: campness, chicks with dicks, bad dress sense, and so on. Clichés all: but in the scheme of things, there could be worse.

Meta-brand, though. What might that be? Well, if we are not careful, i’d suggest clichés such as over-sensitive, inconsistent and ever-so-slightly whingeing. All of which, no matter how untrue, are values that could wash up on our doorstep if we are not careful how we work with comedy and end up pissing off the very peope who could help us most.

A good-houmoured agenda?

First, we need a consistent narrative. I’d like to think that was about objecting to the worst, most offensive examples of tranny humour, and letting slide the rest. Also, some shared sense of what is offensive – which at present seems, in some quarters, to be nothing more than the fact that the t-word got mentioned in a comedic context.

Next, we need to cultivate our friends. Mixed reactions to some recent trans jokes by Sandi Toksvig: but she is intelligent, lesbian and i would have thought open to sensible dialogue. While hectoring is rather more likely to persuade her that we, as community and branc, are entirely toxic.

Ditto Tim Minchin, whose herois apology over the use of the t-word may or may not have been undercut by Transsexual Summer (has anyone sensible been back to Tim to explain better what the issue is?).

Last of all, we need to understand that there are some comedians we will never influence, except negatively. Frankie Boyle, f’rinstance. If anyone thinks we could ever rein him in, short of using a ball gag and rohypnol, they are living in cloud cuckoo land.

However, what he does now is as nothing compared to the damage someone like him could do if some of those things mentioned above on the meta-brand list were to seep into the broader mainstream brand.

At present, he makes jokes at the expense of a clichéd version of ourselves. Imagine, instead, a routine that began: “I have today received a letter from the trans community. Apparently they aren’t happy with x….”…and then goes on to rip into pretty much everything we have to say on anything.

Damage? Much.

I am looking forward to the day when the Comedy wing of TMW gets going (and no: that’s not a joke…tis real). Til then, i hope we can all start to evolve a much more nuanced approach to the subject.

For all our sakes.

jane
xx

5 Responses so far »

  1. 1

    aerynne said,

    Interesting – i think we’re going to accept we’ve lost the battle of telling people not to say tranny… And go with the route of queer/n****r/dyke/fag/ginger/ (thanks tim! :D) of making it ours instead.

    And why shouldn’t we? Its just an abbreviation, and you know what, if i say it about myself in a positive way then other people can’t hurt me with it. There’s no point in giving people a list of ways to insult and belittle us, next time someone shouts ‘tranny’ at me, i’m going to turn round and say: ‘fuck yeah. And?’

  2. 2

    Shirley Anne said,

    I don’t think it matters much what you do in making a stand against comedians or anyone else in whom we are regarded as the butt of their jokes. People will be people and it may only aggravate the situation if we shout too loudly.

    Shirley Anne xxx

  3. 3

    misswonderly said,

    Jane
    You make a lot of generalisations about ‘we’ and ‘them’ so I’ll make one simple generalisation which I think can be substantiated. Comedians do not know who they are making ‘jokes’ about when their target is ‘tr*nnies.’ If comedians are anything like the rest of the population, virtually none have any awareness of ever having met a trans person and certainly not having a meaningful conversation with one. As comedians who work in clubs … and in the same way as others in the LGB community who go to clubs … they may be somewhat more likely than average to have met and talked to drag performers.

    I’m not sure if you have a preconception that TMW plan to try and gag comedians. It seems perhaps you may. The only plan I personally have is to try and encourage them to develop some familiarity with the subjects of their humour, which is exactly the same approach we have taken elsewhere.

    Sarah xo

    • 4

      janefae said,

      “we” in my stuff is never TMW…its just a sort of generic trans we…and hitched on the back of the fact that a lot of people who would identify as trans are currently frothing about comedy.

      Sure: i pick this up from the TMW board, where the current postings are very much focussed on what comedians are saying.

      And if i’m trying to do anything here, it is to argue that what is needed is for a response to the comedy industry that is calm, measured and doesn’t frighten the horses. I’d almost be tempted to suggest “the sort of approach that TMW advocates”…only then i’d be afraid of being misconstrued as trying to speak on TMW’s behalf…

      jane
      xx


Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: