Posts tagged intersex

The press is back to its usual tricks: what changed?

It is pleasing – very! – to be able to report today that some weeks after publishing a disgracefully inaccurate and disrespectful piece on trans and intersex police, the Sunday People is to issue a partial correction in line with representations made by the Press Complaints Commission.

Much less pleasing to read their response and realise that even as Leveson continues his merry way, very little seems to have changed regarding their attitudes for accuracy or even respect for minorities. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (1) »

An evening with UNA

To London, for an evening with Una. Sorry: UNA. Not some quaintly named Madam: but the Westminster branch of the United Nations Association, meeting in a committee room at the heart of that fusty-modern mix that is the Houses of Parliament.

There to hear some excellent speakers on the question of whether the UN is a good place to be campaigning for the rights of sexual minorities, which mostly they seem to think it is. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (2) »

Event: Human rights for sexual minorities: is the UN the right forum to campaign? (House of Lords)

Leave a comment »

Very, very angry…

Did you know that us gender variant folk are little better than sex offenders?

No?

Well, if you live in Australia, today’s news – or perhaps more accurately, last year’s – is just that: to access certain key hormonal treatments, the bureaucrats have decided that those identified with trans or intersex conditions belong in the same category as paedophiles, rapists and the sexually violent.

You could not make this up!

And whilst the detail behind the story, and the fact that it is an issue resurfacing today (as opposed to something suddenly decided) MAY make the news just a smidgeon less offensive, its still the headline that will be remembered – and used, and abused, by those who already have it in for us.

Prescribing guidelines

So let’s start with the headline, as reported in that quite useful site dedicated to sex and sexuality, CarnalNation. Today they report, accurately as far as i can tell, that intersex Australians must register as potential sex offenders to obtain access to certain hormones.

Specifically, testosterone suppressants, like androcur. Trans individuals will recognise that substance, too, since it (or similar) is a regular and often essential part of the transition process.

Unfortunately, as CN reports, taking their cue from feminist blog, the Dawn Chorus, these drugs may only be prescribed for licensed purposes which, at present, include:

- Advanced carcinoma of the prostate;
- To reduce drive in sexual deviations in males.

There is some discussion as to whether the prescribing rules also allow testosterone suppressants to be prescribed for

- Moderate to severe androgenisation in non-pregnant women

So let’s not beat about the Bush (pun unintended!). These drugs are not recreational extras. They are absolute necessities for some of us: in some circs, they may even be life-saving, since they may help persuade someone that suicide is not the only alternative to gender issues.

The real issues

There are three stark out-takes from this, if it is still continuing practice (and i will be doing a bit of my own investigation over the next few days).

First, as some Australian posters have noted, the existence of the third ground as a basis for prescribing and the apparent reluctance of some physicians to use it suggests either ignorance or something worse at work in some parts of that country’s health service. Where they can presecribe, there should be absolutely no excuse for not doing so if it helps the patient.

Second, there is the current and possibly spreading use of prescribing rules as a means whereby pct’s and individual GP’s refuse to hand out treatment in the UK. It remains the case that most of the drugs used to treat intersex and trans conditions are not licensed for those purposes – even though there is now significant history of them being used in those capacities.

That has led to some bureaucrats, some of those looking for “any excuse”, to claim that therefore they cannot prescribe. To refuse to prescribe, even where Gender Identity Clinics have recommended that they do. That is outrage…but given the way the system works, this needs to be fought by demanding the long overdue admission of the drugs in question on to prescribing lists.

Lastly and most sinister. I have frequently covered the way, in the UK in particular, there is a tendency for organisations to share data. Sometimes unlawfully. Sometimes with a nod and a wink in the direction of legality.

That sharing has consequences. Its why trans people have fought for a long time NOT to have their trans status noted on databases, because that often means that individuals reading just that will treat us differently, abusively.

So just imagine if getting treatment meant being placed on a database of potential sex offenders? Just imagine the conversations likely to take place every time a policeman pulled your vehicle over, or stopped you in the street at a demo.

Does anyone expect a mild and civilised exchange of views? Or rather, do we foresee nastiness?

I’d suggest the latter. Which is why, if this is the best Australia can do, we are long overdue sorting out the prescription issue everywhere. In the UK. In the US. Everyehwere.

Before the bureaucrats find how useful this is as a means to put us down.

Jane
xx

P.S. Did i say i was angry. I’m not. No: i’m absolutely fucking flaming angry! And if this story remains true today, then screw Australia!

Comments (8) »

And one more for the road

So i am trying to put together a pitch and then article for the Grauniad on intersex issues. Stories, cases and the like would be great – though i already have some.

However, i am utterly puzzled by a gem i obtained today from the Home Office in response to an open question (something along the lines of “what have you ever done for the intersex minority).

After a day and a half a very short response bounced back:

Other than noting that there is an ongoing review of trans issues, due to report in the autumn (and implying that intersex might be part of that) the spokesman said:

“Current legislation gives intersex people protection from discrimination under certain circumstances – when they are discriminated against because they are wrongly perceived to have one of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act (such as gender reassignment, sex, disability amongst others).”

Huh? What does that mean. It sounds suspiciously like, if you are intersex and discriminated against and that discrimination is because someone thinks you are trans or disabled or whatever…then you have grounds for using the law.

He stressed, in further explanation, that the Equality Act covered those “perceived as” having a protected characteristic. He gave as example someone perceived to be male, but using the female facilities at a swimming pool.

I think he meant that even if you were intersex, that you would be able to object because of the misgendering.

Whilst i was speaking to him, this made sense. The moment i put the phone down, it stopped making sense.

So i’ll throw it open. Anyone have any idea what the above statement means and…does anyone know of any instances where an intersex individual was able to use the Rquality Act or its predecessors by claiming that they were perceived to have or not have the protected characteristic of another group?

jane
xx

Comments (5) »

A toe in the (intersex) water

For most of my life, when i have come across injustice, i have first of all got angry – and then done what i can to help make things better.

Sometimes that may have been less appropriate than i thought it was. Because for most of my life i’ve had, outwardly at least, much of the privilege of a cis male. I’ve seen stuff from the outside: i’ve not experienced it from within.

So, in my Young Liberal days, i campaigned for gay rights, despite not being remotely gay. We-ell, apart from a couple of teen crushes on two exceedingly femme guys. :) I also campaigned against…racism, sexism, fascism…you name it: if there was a nasty -ism in town, i was against it.

Discovering my trans-ness has changed a lot: i’m now part of a minority (in some quarters, a very much despised minority) and though there is something beautiful in finally coming home, its not without its problems.

It also comes with realisation that whilst those outside can help, it is only those on the inside who can truly appreciate the horror of how the world treats them.

So it is with some trepidation that i now raise a flag (and a muffled cheer) for the intersex cause. There is still much to be done on the Gay and Lesbian front: even more for those in the trans community. But for sheer horror at the way society treats individuals with callous disrespect…intersex does seem to be a thoroughly deserving place to do a little stirring.

That said, i get the point about being outside as opposed to in. I’ve spoken to some activists in OII (one of the principal organisations taking up this issue internationally) and i’ve set up a Facebook Group – Intersex UK (sign up if you are interested) – which is a first step to listening to people affected.

If people see me as too much the outsider, OK. I’ll step away.

Otherwise, I have skills when it comes to campaigning and… I don’t have a personal agenda here beyond placing those skills at the disposal of people who need them.

Talk to me!

jane
xx

Comments (6) »

Petition added

Further to today’s piece about Maya Posch…i’ve added link in the sidebar to a petition for intersex rights.

Please sign.

jane
xx

Leave a comment »

Intersex…the forgotten minority

Its probably just as well that i have lizard blood pressure. Either that, or the fact that i can get angry without seeing red.

Still, this morning got me off to a very angry start when i read this honest, poignant, desperate post by Maya Posch. She is Dutch – and intersex – and as she writes (and documents) very clearly, her country and its medical system seem incapable of even recognising the possibility that such a condition exists, let alone doing anything remotely helpful to deal with it.

I posted on her blog to express both my sadness at her plight, and a commitment to campaign, when i can, to support the rights of intersexed individuals.

There is so much i just don’t get about these issues: maybe i am just too simplistic in my approach; or maybe it is just that i found politics and political activism long before i discovered my own trans nature. I was actively campaigning for gay rights in the 1970′s, at a time when it was seriously untrendy – and when the consequences of that activism could be quite brutal (back then, “police responsibility for hate crime” meant something very different indeed).

I’ll bang the drum for women’s rights and trans rights when an issue comes along worth making noise about. And i’ll just as readily get out there for people like Maya.

Because i don’t get and do not understand the exclusivity that goes on within some sections of the LGBT(QI) movement: why some minorities think it OK to gain their rights – and then draw the ladder up behind them.

I was bemused when i was first told that as a trans person i was “appropriating” intersex issues. Why? Well, that’s what we do. Although i’ve since understood that a little better, having been enlightened as to some of the horrors perpetrated by a few in the trans community against those who are intersex.

No. The score right now is that people who are Lesbian and Gay have been winning rights over the last thirty years, have made good progress, but still have a way to go. Rights for trans people pretty much left the starting blocks about ten years back, and have rapidly been catching up: but we too have further to go.

And rights for intersex people aren’t even on the scoreboard.

Note the commonality? Its about PEOPLE: not “lesbians”, “gays”, “trans”, “intersexes” or however you wish to mangle the language to cover it. And if people are getting shafted by the system, they deserve help.

And of course, it isn’t all about the Netherlands. One case i have been able to help with far less than i would have liked was happening, over the last few months in the UK. An intersex individual nearly died as a result of crap treatment by the various systems supposed to help her: one reason for the poverty of treatment was that those supposedly helping her took issue with the idea of intersex as a condition, insisting on insulting her by calling her male or trans – and labelling her as truculent when she, not unnaturally, took exception to her treatment.

Sorry, folks: its an absolute utter scandal that when the last government took some very positive steps in respect of trans rights, it couldn’t bring itself to even recognise intersex as having existence. That means people like Maya suffer every day, not just in countries far far away (like Holland?) – but also today, now, in the UK.

That bloody well needs to stop!

jane
xx

Comments (2) »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 101 other followers